AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSIvsAUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Quattro (TYP 85)
Sport 2.1 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score82/100
AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo
- Lightest1,273 kg2,806 lb
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk307 L
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,273kg2,806lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 62.8s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 652km405mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,133cc130cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,160mm164in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,342mm53in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,224mm88in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,487mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 290L | 307L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-6,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 6,600 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 306 hp 228 kW |
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI has 34 hp more than AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo and AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 1,273 kg 2,806 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 248 km/h 154 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 4.6 s |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI and AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 306 hp 228 kW | 4.8 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,273 kg 2,806 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 652 km 405 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo
- Is 177 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























