AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWhvsIM LS7 90 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonIM LS7
90 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque664 Nm490 lb-ft
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score0/100
IM LS7 90 kWh
- Lightest2,400 kg5,291 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk733 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | IMLS790 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 664Nm490lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Gross weight | 3,170kg6,989lb | 2,851kg6,285lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.6s Calculated | 39.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,915mm194in | 5,049mm199in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 2,002mm79in |
| Height | 1,619mm64in | 1,731mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,928mm115in | 3,060mm120in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,700mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,715mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 528L | 733L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,567L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | IMLS790 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.6 s | 39.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW |
| IMLS790 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 664 Nm 490 lb-ft |
| IMLS790 kWh | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb |
| IMLS790 kWh | 2,400 kg 5,291 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| IMLS790 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 6.0 s |
| IMLS790 kWh | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh and IM LS7 90 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| IMLS790 kWh | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| IMLS790 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| IMLS790 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | IMLS790 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 664 Nm 490 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb | 2,400 kg 5,291 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 528 L 18.6 cu ft | 733 L 25.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh
- Has 189 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
IM LS7 90 kWh
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 205 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























