AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6vsAUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q8 (4M)
50 TDI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest2,100 kg4,630 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score89/100
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,103 km685 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,145kg4,729lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,890kg6,371lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s Calculated | 26.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km463mi Calculated | 1,103km685mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,992mm197in | 4,986mm196in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,995mm79in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,705mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,691mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 254mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 605L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,755L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 5,200-6,400 rpm | 1,370-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 2,250-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 26.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW |
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6 has 54 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 5.6 s |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6 and AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: 4.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 746 km 463 mi |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 1,103 km 685 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 463 mi | 1,103 km 685 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6 | AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6
- Has 54 hp more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 4.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 357 km (222 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























