Lynk & Co 09
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8vsAUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q8 (4M)
45 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption2.8 L/100 km84.0 mpg US100.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,786 km1,110 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score99/100
- Best practicality score91/100
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest2,160 kg4,762 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,890kg6,371lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 95.4s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.4s Calculated | 36.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2.8L/100 km84mpg US100.9mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,786km1,110mi Calculated | 1,042km647mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 5,042mm199in | 4,986mm196in |
| Width | 1,977mm78in | 1,995mm79in |
| Height | 1,780mm70in | 1,705mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | - | 1,679mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,691mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 225mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 605L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,755L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.4 s | 36.9 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW |
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 has 23 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 5.6 s |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 and AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 and AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 1,786 km 1,110 mi |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 1,042 km 647 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 |
| 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,786 km 1,110 mi | 1,042 km 647 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 | AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 2.8 L/100 km84 mpg US100.9 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 4.90 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 7.89 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 420 L111 US gal92 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 735.00 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8
- Has 23 hp more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 744 km (462 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























