AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
2.0 P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score87/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,065 km662 mi
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | - |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.4s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 81.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,065km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 5,000 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 has 19 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 1,065 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,065 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
- Has 19 hp more
- Is 285 kg lighter
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Has 143 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























