AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDIvsBuick Envision II Plus 652T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBuick Envision II
Plus 652T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Lightest1,890 kg4,167 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t94 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 237hp177kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | - |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 95.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 92.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.8s Calculated | 42.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.7mpg US36.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,845mm191in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,883mm74in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,695mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,612mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 515L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,712L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: Power / Torque
- Buick Envision II Plus 652T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.8 s | 42.7 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW |
Buick Envision II Plus 652T has 6 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.1 s |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 8.4 s |
Although Buick Envision II Plus 652T has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 237 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI | Buick Envision II Plus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.7 mpg US36.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 13.39 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 21.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,148 L303 US gal252 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,008 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 153 km (95 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 270 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























