Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsAUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

25d

231 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS

AUDI Q8 (4M)

45 TDI

231 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    231 hp
    172 kW
  • Lightest
    1,620 kg
    3,571 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    143 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,042 km
    647 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)25dAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
Power
231hp172kW
231hp172kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
2,160kg4,762lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,890kg6,371lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
70.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
95.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
25.6s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
1,042km647mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
2,967cc181cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,986mm196in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,995mm79in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,705mm67in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,995mm118in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,679mm66in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,691mm67in
Trunk volume
470L
605L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,755L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
75L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 25dAUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDIPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)25d4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI3,500-5,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)25dAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.6 s
36.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
231 hp
172 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
2,160 kg
4,762 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
237 km/h
147 mph
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
226 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d6.6 s
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI7.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
1,000 km
621 mi
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
1,042 km
647 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
231 hp
172 kW
7.1 s
226 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,986 mm
196.3 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
6.6 s
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)25d
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)25dAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.1 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
2,160 kg
4,762 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,986 mm
196.3 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
1,042 km
647 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 25dAUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Is 540 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 135 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 25d vs AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster