Hongqi HS5
Car comparison
Hongqi HS5 2.0TvsAUDI Q6 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q6
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hongqi HS5 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,755 kg3,869 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score90/100
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | HongqiHS52.0T | AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Gross weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 2,765kg6,096lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 90.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 104.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.7s Calculated | 52.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 757km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,760mm187in | 5,099mm201in |
| Width | 1,907mm75in | 2,014mm79in |
| Height | 1,700mm67in | 1,784mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,704mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,721mm68in |
| Trunk volume | - | 286L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,398L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | - | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HongqiHS52.0T | AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.7 s | 52.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 224 hp 167 kW |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW |
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI has 7 hp more than Hongqi HS5 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Hongqi HS5 2.0T and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 8.2 s |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 8.6 s |
Although AUDI Q6 40 TFSI has more power, Hongqi HS5 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hongqi HS5 2.0T and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hongqi HS5 2.0T and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 224 hp 167 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ640 TFSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Hongqi HS5 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HongqiHS52.0T | AUDIQ640 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 757 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hongqi HS5 2.0T | AUDI Q6 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 16.19 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 26.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,388 L367 US gal305 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,428 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hongqi HS5 2.0T
- Is 450 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























