Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
45 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,565kg5,655lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.0s Calculated | 30.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 789km491mi Calculated | 1,048km651mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 4,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 3,250-4,750 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.0 s | 30.4 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 6.3 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 6.7 s |
Although AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 789 km 491 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 1,048 km 651 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 789 km 491 mi | 1,048 km 651 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 259 km (161 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























