Kia XCeed
Car comparison
Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,204 km748 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,456 kg3,210 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,456kg3,210lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Gross weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 2,510kg5,534lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 84.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.2s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 1,204km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,591cc97cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,682mm184in |
| Width | 1,826mm72in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,495mm59in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,573mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 426L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,378L | 1,520L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.2 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 7.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI and Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 769 km 478 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 1,204 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KiaXCeed1.6 T-GDI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 1,204 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 426 L 15.0 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI
- Is 349 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
- Has 135 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 434 km (270 mi) more estimated range
- Has 94 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























