AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIvsDS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 7 Crossback
1.6 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption2.2 L/100 km106.9 mpg US128.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions128 g/km
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score100/100
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 2.2L/100 km106.9mpg US128.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,121km696mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,573mm180in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,906mm75in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,738mm108in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 555L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 628L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 200 hp 149 kW |
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech has 10 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 7.6 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
| 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK | ||||||
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,121 km 696 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI | DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 2.2 L/100 km106.9 mpg US128.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 3.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 6.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 330 L87 US gal73 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 577.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























