BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,121 km696 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score86/100
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.8s Calculated | 37.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 1,121km696mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.8 s | 37.0 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.8 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 7.6 s |
Although BMW X2 (F39) 20i has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 910 km 566 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,121 km 696 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.8 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 1,121 km 696 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 210 km (131 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























