Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

20i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

40 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,121 km
    696 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)20iAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,745kg3,847lb
Gross weight
2,145kg4,729lb
2,430kg5,357lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
78.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
37.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
1,121km696mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,663mm184in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,893mm75in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,819mm111in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,616mm64in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,609mm63in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
-
Trunk volume
470L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
65L
CO2 emissions-
153g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 20iAUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI3,250-4,200 rpm1,500-3,250 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)20iAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
37.0 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1,745 kg
3,847 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
224 km/h
139 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
223 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i7.8 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI7.6 s

Although BMW X2 (F39) 20i has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
910 km
566 mi
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1,121 km
696 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
7.8 s
224 km/h
139 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
223 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.8 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)20iAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.6 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
1,121 km
696 mi
CO2 score
-
153 g/km
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 20iAUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 205 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 210 km (131 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i vs AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster