AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best performance score51/100
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,226 km762 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,415kg5,324lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,226km762mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 7.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,226 km 762 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,226 km 762 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 226 km (141 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























