Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    139 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,226 km
    762 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
190hp142kW
192hp143kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,745kg3,847lb
1,530kg3,373lb
Gross weight
2,415kg5,324lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
85.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
76.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
37.0s
Calculated
34.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,226km762mi
Calculated
773km480mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,299mm169in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,822mm72in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,557mm61in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,563mm62in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance-
165mm6in
Trunk volume
550L
450L
Max trunk volume-
1,390L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
51L
CO2 emissions
139g/km
150g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.0 s
34.3 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
1,530 kg
3,373 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
223 km/h
139 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI7.6 s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.07.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1,226 km
762 mi
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
773 km
480 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
223 km/h
139 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.2 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.6 s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.2 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Range score
1,226 km
762 mi
773 km
480 mi
CO2 score
139 g/km
150 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 454 km (282 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 11 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 215 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI clean diesel
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI clean diesel
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI vs Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster