AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6vsBMW X3 (F25) 30d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25)
30d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25) 30d
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lightest1,800 kg3,968 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range1,117 km694 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score91/100
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | BMWX3 (F25)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Gross weight | 2,450kg5,401lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 27.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 1,117km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,648mm183in |
| Width | 1,898mm75in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25) 30d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 4,780-6,500 rpm | 2,150-4,780 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | BMWX3 (F25)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 27.8 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 258 hp 192 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6 has 14 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 30d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 30d and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 5.9 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6 and BMW X3 (F25) 30d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 30d and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 882 km 548 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 1,117 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)30d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25) 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6 | BMWX3 (F25)30d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 1,117 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6 | BMW X3 (F25) 30d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TFSI V6
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X3 (F25) 30d
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 234 km (146 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























