AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6vsAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 III (GU)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lightest1,860 kg4,101 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,172 km728 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score90/100
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful268 hp200 kW
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk782 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 268hp200kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Gross weight | 2,470kg5,445lb | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.1s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,172km728mi Calculated | 691km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,717mm186in |
| Width | 1,898mm75in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,669mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,817mm111in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 782L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 1,611L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.1 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 268 hp 200 kW |
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has 23 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6 and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6 and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 1,172 km 728 mi |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 691 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 268 hp 200 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 268 hp 200 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,172 km 728 mi | 691 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 782 L 27.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6 | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 3.0 TDI V6
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 480 km (298 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 23 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 242 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























