AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,755 kg3,869 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range949 km590 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,535kg5,589lb | 2,365kg5,214lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 81.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.2s Calculated | 35.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 855km531mi Calculated | 949km590mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 184g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 4,500-6,250 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.2 s | 35.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 225 hp 168 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI has 21 hp more than AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 855 km 531 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 949 km 590 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.1 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 855 km 531 mi | 949 km 590 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 184 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 94 km (58 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























