AUDI Q5 I (8R)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSIvsBMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (E83)
3.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score86/100
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | BMWX3 (E83)3.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,355kg5,192lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 83.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.7s Calculated | 50.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,853mm73in |
| Height | 1,653mm65in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | BMWX3 (E83)3.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.7 s | 50.5 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 218 hp 163 kW |
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d has 7 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 7.6 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 7.7 s |
Although BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d has more power, AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 882 km 548 mi |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.7 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI | BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























