BMW X1 (E84)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84) 25ivsAUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score86/100
BMW X1 (E84) 25i
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84)25i | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 81.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.5s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,454mm175in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,653mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,613mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 194mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84) 25i: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 6,100 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84)25i | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.5 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 218 hp 163 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
BMW X1 (E84) 25i has 7 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 7.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
Although BMW X1 (E84) 25i has more power, AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 677 km 421 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84)25i | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84) 25i | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84) 25i
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 205 km (127 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























