AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSIvsHongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.7 mpg US35.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range808 km502 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score90/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,776 kg3,915 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 228hp170kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,776kg3,915lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,270kg5,004lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 82.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.2s Calculated | 38.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.7mpg US35.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 561km348mi Calculated | 808km502mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,989cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,785mm188in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,905mm75in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,700mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 5,000-6,700 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.2 s | 38.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 228 hp 170 kW |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 252 hp 188 kW |
Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T has 24 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 1,776 kg 3,915 lb |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 7.4 s |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 7.7 s |
Although Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T has more power, AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 7.9 L/100 km 29.7 mpg US 35.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 561 km 348 mi |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 808 km 502 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 228 hp 170 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 252 hp 188 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.7 mpg US 35.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 7.9 L/100 km 29.7 mpg US 35.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.7 mpg US 35.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 228 hp 170 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,776 kg 3,915 lb | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.7 mpg US 35.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 561 km 348 mi | 808 km 502 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI | Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.7 mpg US35.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 13.86 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 22.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,188 L314 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 2,079 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
- Is 44 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 247 km (154 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























