Car comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

40 TFSI

184 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2025
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Most powerful
    186 hp
    139 kW
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    836 km
    520 mi
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
184hp137kW
186hp139kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight-
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
107.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
77.6s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.1s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
48.7s
Calculated
64.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.6s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.6s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
638km397mi
Calculated
836km520mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,485mm177in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,849mm73in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,580mm62in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance-
180mm7in
Trunk volume
530L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.6 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.1 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.7 s
64.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.6 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
184 hp
137 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has 2 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI9.1 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
638 km
397 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
836 km
520 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
184 hp
137 kW
9.1 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.7 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,485 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
9.1 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
184 hp
137 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.1 s
8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,485 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
638 km
397 mi
836 km
520 mi
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 280 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
40 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
40 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
40 TFSI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
40 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
40 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ640 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster