Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0vsAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 II (F3)
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t99 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score89/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Best estimated range800 km497 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.2s Calculated | 37.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,484mm177in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,856mm73in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 170g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.2 s | 37.1 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 7.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.4 s |
Although Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 has more power, AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 785 km 488 mi |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 170 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























