AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions170 g/km
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score87/100
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 92.2s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.1s Calculated | 57.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 800km497mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,484mm177in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,856mm73in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 4,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.1 s | 57.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI has 10 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 800 km 497 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 800 km 497 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 200 km (124 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























