AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIvsAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range914 km568 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score88/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 108.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 79.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.7s Calculated | 39.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 638km397mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,388mm173in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,365L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.7 s | 39.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI has 4 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 9.1 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.6 s |
Although AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI has more power, AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 638 km 397 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 184 hp 137 kW | 9.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 638 km 397 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 276 km (171 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























