AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIvsAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,074 km667 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 79.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.5s Calculated | 39.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,074km667mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,484mm177in | 4,388mm173in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,365L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 3,600-4,100 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 4,000-6,200 rpm | 1,400-3,900 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.5 s | 39.7 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI has 20 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 7.3 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 1,074 km 667 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,074 km 667 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 160 km (99 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Is 120 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























