BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 25ivsAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 25i
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range924 km574 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)25i | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,165kg4,773lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.0s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 924km574mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,388mm173in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,365L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 25i: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)25i | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 25i has 11 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (F48) 25i: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 6.4 s |
Although BMW X1 (F48) 25i has more power, AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (F48) 25i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25i and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 924 km 574 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.4 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 25i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25i | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)25i | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 924 km 574 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 25i | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 25i
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























