AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.0s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 89.2s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 43.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,385mm173in |
| Width | 1,898mm75in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 4,500-6,250 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 43.3 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 225 hp 168 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI has 48 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Has 48 hp more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























