AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,565kg3,450lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.0s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 89.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 43.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,388mm173in | 4,385mm173in |
| Width | 1,831mm72in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,365L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 43.3 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI has 43 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 6.4 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 889 km 552 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.4 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Has 43 hp more
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























