AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsAUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,226 km762 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,415kg5,324lb | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 49.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,226km762mi Calculated | 1,085km674mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,385mm173in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 460L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 49.0 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI has 13 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 7.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,226 km 762 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 1,085 km 674 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.2 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,226 km 762 mi | 1,085 km 674 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI | AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TDI
- Is 85 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























