AUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020 35 TFSIvsAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TFSI
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Lightest1,305 kg2,877 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range943 km586 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,305kg2,877lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.4s Calculated | 39.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 943km586mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,208mm166in | 4,388mm173in |
| Width | 1,794mm71in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,508mm59in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,601mm102in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,050L | 1,365L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 4,000-6,200 rpm | 1,400-3,900 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.4 s | 39.6 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI has 30 hp more than AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TFSI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TFSI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TFSI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 943 km 586 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 943 km 586 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TFSI | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TFSI
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























