AUDI Q2
Car comparison
AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSIvsBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,085 km674 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 35.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 859km534mi Calculated | 1,085km674mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,191mm165in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,794mm71in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,508mm59in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,000L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 146g/km | 123g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,150 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 6.5 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 859 km 534 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,085 km 674 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | BMWX1 (F48)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 859 km 534 mi | 1,085 km 674 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 146 g/km | 123 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI | BMW X1 (F48) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 226 km (140 mi) more estimated range
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























