BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20ivsAUDI Q2 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q2
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20i | AUDIQ22.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,485kg3,274lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 71.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.4s Calculated | 35.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 850km528mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,191mm165in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,508mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20i | AUDIQ22.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.4 s | 35.8 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 20i has 2 hp more than AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 7.7 s |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 7.3 s |
Although BMW X1 (F48) 20i has more power, AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 850 km 528 mi |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20i | AUDIQ22.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 850 km 528 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20i | AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 228 km (142 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























