Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 20ivsAUDI Q2 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

20i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

AUDI Q2

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,480 kg
    3,263 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    134 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,078 km
    670 mi
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

BMW X1 (F48) 20i

  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)20iAUDIQ22.0 TDI
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,480kg3,263lb
Gross weight
2,140kg4,718lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
76.4s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
71.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
34.1s
Calculated
35.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
953km592mi
Calculated
1,078km670mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,191mm165in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,794mm71in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,508mm59in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,595mm102in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,547mm61in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,548mm61in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
-
Trunk volume
505L
355L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,000L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
55L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
134g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 20iAUDI Q2 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)20i5,000-6,000 rpm1,250-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ22.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,900-3,300 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)20iAUDIQ22.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.1 s
35.8 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20i
192 hp
143 kW
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

BMW X1 (F48) 20i has 2 hp more than AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20i
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
1,480 kg
3,263 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20i
223 km/h
139 mph
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20i7.4 s
AUDIQ22.0 TDI7.3 s

Although BMW X1 (F48) 20i has more power, AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20i
953 km
592 mi
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
1,078 km
670 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)20i
192 hp
143 kW
7.4 s
223 km/h
139 mph
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.3 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
4,191 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,508 mm
59.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)20i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.4 s
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ22.0 TDI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)20iAUDIQ22.0 TDI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.3 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
4,191 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,508 mm
59.4 in
Range score
953 km
592 mi
1,078 km
670 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
134 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 20iAUDI Q2 2.0 TDI
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20i

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 150 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 60 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 15 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20i vs AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster