AUDI Q2
Car comparison
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ22.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 92.2s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.8s Calculated | 57.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,078km670mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,191mm165in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,794mm71in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,508mm59in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,000L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 4,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ22.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.8 s | 57.9 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 7.3 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ22.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,078 km 670 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q2 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 78 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Has 185 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























