AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q2
1.4 TFSI COD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best estimated range914 km568 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
- Lightest1,265 kg2,789 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions130 g/km
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,265kg2,789lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.6s Calculated | 52.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 914km568mi Calculated | 862km536mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,388mm173in | 4,191mm165in |
| Width | 1,831mm72in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,508mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,365L | 1,050L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 4,000-6,200 rpm | 1,400-3,900 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.6 s | 52.5 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 150 hp 112 kW |
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI has 30 hp more than AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.6 s |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 914 km 568 mi |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 862 km 536 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 914 km 568 mi | 862 km 536 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 31 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























