XPENG G9 · Facelift 2025
Car comparison
XPENG G9 · Facelift 2025 Long Range 79 kWhvsAUDI E7X 109 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI E7X
109 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI E7X 109 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score62/100
XPENG G9 Facelift 2025 Long Range 79 kWh
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,196 kg4,841 lb
- Largest trunk754 L
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | AUDIE7X109 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 351hp262kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,196kg4,841lb | 2,526kg5,569lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,977kg6,563lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 60.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.7s Calculated | 47.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,891mm193in | 5,049mm199in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,997mm79in |
| Height | 1,670mm66in | 1,710mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 3,060mm120in |
| Front track | - | 1,705mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,717mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 754L | 682L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,795L | 1,940L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | AUDIE7X109 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.7 s | 47.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | 351 hp 262 kW |
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW |
AUDI E7X 109 kWh has 57 hp more than XPENG G9 Facelift 2025 Long Range 79 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between XPENG G9 Facelift 2025 Long Range 79 kWh and AUDI E7X 109 kWh: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | 2,196 kg 4,841 lb |
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 2,526 kg 5,569 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | 6.6 s |
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI E7X 109 kWh and XPENG G9 Facelift 2025 Long Range 79 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 162 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | 351 hp 262 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW | 6.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIE7X109 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XPENGG9Facelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh | AUDIE7X109 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 351 hp 262 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,196 kg 4,841 lb | 2,526 kg 5,569 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 754 L 26.6 cu ft | 682 L 24.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
XPENG G9 Facelift 2025 Long Range 79 kWh
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 72 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
AUDI E7X 109 kWh
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























