AUDI E7X
Car comparison
AUDI E7X 109 kWhvsHongqi EHS7 85 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi EHS7
85 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI E7X 109 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful680 hp507 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight254 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk654 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh
- Lightest2,533 kg5,584 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIE7X109 kWh | HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 680hp507kW | 619hp462kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 756Nm558lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,673kg5,893lb | 2,533kg5,584lb |
| Gross weight | 3,049kg6,722lb | 3,068kg6,764lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 36.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 254hp/t190kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,049mm199in | 4,925mm194in |
| Width | 1,997mm79in | 1,950mm77in |
| Height | 1,710mm67in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,060mm120in | 3,000mm118in |
| Front track | 1,705mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,717mm68in | - |
| Trunk volume | 654L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,073L | 1,709L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIE7X109 kWh | HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 680 hp 507 kW |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 619 hp 462 kW |
AUDI E7X 109 kWh has 61 hp more than Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh and AUDI E7X 109 kWh: 61 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 756 Nm 558 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 2,673 kg 5,893 lb |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 2,533 kg 5,584 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 3.9 s |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI E7X 109 kWh and Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 254 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIE7X109 kWh | 680 hp 507 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 619 hp 462 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIE7X109 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIE7X109 kWh | HongqiEHS785 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 680 hp 507 kW | 619 hp 462 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 756 Nm 558 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,673 kg 5,893 lb | 2,533 kg 5,584 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 654 L 23.1 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 254 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI E7X 109 kWh
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 44 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 198 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh
- Is 140 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























