AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWhvsAUDI E7X 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI E7X
100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI E7X 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Lightest2,482 kg5,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk682 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score92/100
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Highest torque664 Nm490 lb-ft
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | AUDIE7X100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 664Nm490lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,482kg5,472lb |
| Gross weight | 3,170kg6,989lb | 2,933kg6,466lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 55.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.6s Calculated | 43.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,915mm194in | 5,049mm199in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,997mm79in |
| Height | 1,619mm64in | 1,710mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,928mm115in | 3,060mm120in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,705mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,717mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 528L | 682L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,567L | 1,940L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | AUDIE7X100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.6 s | 43.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW |
| AUDIE7X100 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW |
AUDI E7X 100 kWh has 68 hp more than AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh and AUDI E7X 100 kWh: 68 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 664 Nm 490 lb-ft |
| AUDIE7X100 kWh | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb |
| AUDIE7X100 kWh | 2,482 kg 5,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| AUDIE7X100 kWh | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 6.0 s |
| AUDIE7X100 kWh | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI E7X 100 kWh and AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| AUDIE7X100 kWh | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| AUDIE7X100 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW | 5.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIE7X100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | AUDIE7X100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 664 Nm 490 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb | 2,482 kg 5,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 528 L 18.6 cu ft | 682 L 24.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh
- Has 164 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI E7X 100 kWh
- Has 68 hp more
- Is 28 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 154 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























