MG IM5
Car comparison
MG IM5 100 kWhvsAUDI E5 Sportback 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI E5 Sportback
100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
MG IM5 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed268 km/h167 mph
- Highest torque802 Nm592 lb-ft
- Lightest2,298 kg5,066 lb
- Largest trunk457 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score79/100
AUDI E5 Sportback 100 kWh
- Most powerful787 hp587 kW
- Best power-to-weight336 hp/t250 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MGIM5100 kWh | AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 751hp560kW | 787hp587kW |
| Torque | 802Nm592lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,298kg5,066lb | 2,343kg5,165lb |
| Gross weight | 2,730kg6,019lb | 2,779kg6,127lb |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.7s99% target: 265 km/h / 165 mph Calculated | 38.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated | 336hp/t250kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,931mm194in | 4,881mm192in |
| Width | 1,960mm77in | 1,960mm77in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,950mm116in | 2,950mm116in |
| Front track | - | 1,677mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,672mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 457L | 347L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MGIM5100 kWh | AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 13.3 s |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGIM5100 kWh | 751 hp 560 kW |
| AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh | 787 hp 587 kW |
AUDI E5 Sportback 100 kWh has 36 hp more than MG IM5 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between MG IM5 100 kWh and AUDI E5 Sportback 100 kWh: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGIM5100 kWh | 802 Nm 592 lb-ft |
| AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGIM5100 kWh | 2,298 kg 5,066 lb |
| AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh | 2,343 kg 5,165 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGIM5100 kWh | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGIM5100 kWh | 3.2 s |
| AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh | 3.4 s |
Although AUDI E5 Sportback 100 kWh has more power, MG IM5 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG IM5 100 kWh and AUDI E5 Sportback 100 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGIM5100 kWh | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh | 336 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGIM5100 kWh | 751 hp 560 kW | 3.2 s | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh | 787 hp 587 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGIM5100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MGIM5100 kWh | AUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 751 hp 560 kW | 787 hp 587 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 802 Nm 592 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,298 kg 5,066 lb | 2,343 kg 5,165 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 457 L 16.1 cu ft | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 336 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
MG IM5 100 kWh
- Has 2 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
AUDI E5 Sportback 100 kWh
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























