AUDI e-tron GT
Car comparison
AUDI e-tron GT 93.4 kWhvsAUDI S e-tron GT 105 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI S e-tron GT
105 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S e-tron GT 105 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Most powerful679 hp506 kW
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight294 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best practicality score67/100
AUDI e-tron GT 93.4 kWh
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted245 km/h152 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,276 kg5,018 lb
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 679hp506kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,276kg5,018lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Gross weight | 2,840kg6,261lb | 2,840kg6,261lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 245 km/h152 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 48.0s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 34.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 294hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,989mm196in | 4,997mm197in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,396mm55in | 1,402mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,898mm114in | 2,900mm114in |
| Front track | 1,710mm67in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,694mm67in | 1,667mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 11.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 245 km/h152 mph Limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 197 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | 530 hp 395 kW |
| AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh | 679 hp 506 kW |
AUDI S e-tron GT 105 kWh has 149 hp more than AUDI e-tron GT 93.4 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI e-tron GT 93.4 kWh and AUDI S e-tron GT 105 kWh: 149 hp (111 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb |
| AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 245 km/h152 mph |
| AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | 4.1 s |
| AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh | 3.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S e-tron GT 105 kWh and AUDI e-tron GT 93.4 kWh: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 245 km/h152 mph |
| AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh | 679 hp 506 kW | 3.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIe-tron GT93.4 kWh | AUDIS e-tron GT105 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 679 hp 506 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 245 km/h152 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI e-tron GT 93.4 kWh
- Is 34 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
AUDI S e-tron GT 105 kWh
- Has 149 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























