AUDI A8L (D4/4H)
Car comparison
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12vsJaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X250)
R 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque625 Nm461 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.2 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range726 km451 mi
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best economy score74/100
Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Lightest1,891 kg4,169 lb
- Best power-to-weight270 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 625Nm461lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 1,891kg4,169lb |
| Gross weight | 2,655kg5,853lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 45.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 331Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 726km451mi Calculated | 560km348mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,299cc384cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,267mm207in | 4,961mm195in |
| Width | 1,949mm77in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,122mm123in | 2,909mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,635mm64in | 1,571mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 510L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 906L | 923L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 290g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 6,200 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 14.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 has 10 hp more than AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 and Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 1,891 kg 4,169 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 4.9 s |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 has more power, AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 726 km 451 mi |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 560 km 348 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | 1,891 kg 4,169 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 726 km 451 mi | 560 km 348 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 290 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 | Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 164 kg lighter
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























