AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) · Facelift 2023 40 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,504 kg3,316 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,504kg3,316lb |
| Gross weight | 2,315kg5,104lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 138.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 137.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.6s Calculated | 54.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,033km642mi Calculated | 1,294km804mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,926mm115in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,651mm65in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.6 s | 54.8 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI has 54 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 1,504 kg 3,316 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 1,033 km 642 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,504 kg 3,316 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,033 km 642 mi | 1,294 km 804 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI | Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI
- Has 54 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI
- Is 191 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 261 km (162 mi) more estimated range
- Has 28 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























