AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) · Facelift 2023 40 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
1.5 TSI ACT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT
- Lightest1,556 kg3,430 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,556kg3,430lb |
| Gross weight | 2,435kg5,368lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 132.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 134.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.6s Calculated | 56.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,926mm115in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,651mm65in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.6 s | 56.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW |
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI has 54 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 1,556 kg 3,430 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,556 kg 3,430 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI | Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI
- Has 54 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT
- Is 209 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Has 28 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























