Volvo V70 III
Car comparison
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5vsAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7)
3.0 TDI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions156 g/km
- Best estimated range1,271 km790 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score91/100
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,567 kg3,455 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,567kg3,455lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 62.8s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 22.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 1,271km790mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,823mm190in | 4,926mm194in |
| Width | - | 1,874mm74in |
| Height | 1,547mm61in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,816mm111in | 2,912mm115in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,627mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 151mm6in | 117mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,680L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,980 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 4,000-4,500 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 22.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 245 hp 183 kW |
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6 has 5 hp more than Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 7.7 s |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6 and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6 and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 864 km 537 mi |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 1,271 km 790 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.3 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 1,271 km 790 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 | AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Is 223 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 3.0 TDI V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 260 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 407 km (253 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 33 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























