Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 D4vsAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI ultra
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TDI ultra
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI ultra
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions121 g/km
- Best estimated range1,587 km986 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 D4 | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,882kg4,149lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,355kg5,192lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 83.5s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 36.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 1,587km986mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,943mm195in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,874mm74in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,912mm115in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,627mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,680L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 73L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | 121g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI ultra: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 D4 | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 36.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 8.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 1,587 km 986 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 D4 | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 1,587 km 986 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | 121 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 | AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI ultra
- Is 157 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 417 km (259 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























