AUDI A6 Avant (C9)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDIvsAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016
1.8 TFSI ultra
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score91/100
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,083 km673 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 2,555kg5,633lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 79.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.0s Calculated | 34.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,053km654mi Calculated | 1,083km673mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,999mm197in | 4,943mm195in |
| Width | 1,875mm74in | 1,874mm74in |
| Height | 1,472mm58in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,923mm115in | 2,912mm115in |
| Front track | 1,631mm64in | 1,627mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,616mm64in | 1,618mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 466L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,497L | 1,680L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 4,200-6,200 rpm | 1,400-4,100 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.0 s | 34.5 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDI has 14 hp more than AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra and AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 1,053 km 654 mi |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 1,083 km 673 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,053 km 654 mi | 1,083 km 673 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDI | AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 Avant (C9) 2.0 TDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
- Has 99 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























