AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6vsVolvo V50 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V50
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range722 km448 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.5s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km448mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,123cc191cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,933mm194in | 4,514mm178in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,463mm58in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,843mm112in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,612mm63in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 417L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,660L | 1,307L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 233g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.5 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 has 35 hp more than Volvo V50 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 722 km 448 mi |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 604 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | VolvoV502.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 448 mi | 604 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 233 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 117 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Has 148 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























