Skoda Superb IV Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSIvsAUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 allroad (C8)
45 TDI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,824 kg4,021 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk690 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score91/100
AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range887 km551 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,824kg4,021lb | 1,945kg4,288lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,625kg5,787lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 81.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s Calculated | 22.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 805km500mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,902mm193in | 4,951mm195in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,482mm58in | 1,542mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,925mm115in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,645mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,566mm62in | 1,611mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 184mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 690L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,920L | 1,660L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 3,500-4,750 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 22.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI has 20 hp more than AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6 and Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 1,824 kg 4,021 lb |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 1,945 kg 4,288 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 5.7 s |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI and AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6 and Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 805 km 500 mi |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | AUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,824 kg 4,021 lb | 1,945 kg 4,288 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 805 km 500 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 690 L 24.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI | AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 45 TDI V6
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























