MG ZT-T
Car comparison
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8vsAUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6)
3.2 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score60/100
AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range741 km460 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MGZT-T4.6 V8 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 3,123cc191cu in |
| Length | 4,790mm189in | 4,934mm194in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,862mm73in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,519mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,220L | 1,660L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 314g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 5,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MGZT-T4.6 V8 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 256 hp 191 kW |
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 has 4 hp more than AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 6.7 s |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 and AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 256 hp 191 kW | 7.2 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MGZT-T4.6 V8 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 314 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 | AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 241 km (150 mi) more estimated range
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























