Car comparison

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001 2.7 V6vsNissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001

2.7 V6

250 hp2671 ccGasolineAWDManualTwin-turboSedan2001-2004
VS

Nissan Cedric (Y34)

2.5T

260 hp2498 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1999-2004

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    248 km/h
    154 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T

  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    152 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    640 km
    398 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
Power
250hp186kW
260hp194kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
324Nm239lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,710kg3,770lb
Gross weight
2,210kg4,872lb
1,985kg4,376lb
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
68.7s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
23.1s
Calculated
28.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
603km375mi
Calculated
640km398mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,671cc163cu in
2,498cc152cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,860mm191in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,453mm57in
1,465mm58in
Wheelbase
2,759mm109in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,540mm61in
1,510mm59in
Rear track
1,569mm62in
1,510mm59in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Max trunk volume
434L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
80L
CO2 emissions
278g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5TPowerTorque
  • AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V65,800 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm6,050 rpm
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T6,400 rpm2,800 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.1 s
28.7 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
250 hp
186 kW
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
260 hp
194 kW

Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T has 10 hp more than AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
324 Nm
239 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
1,710 kg
3,770 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
248 km/h
154 mph
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V66.8 s
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T7.8 s

Although Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T has more power, AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
603 km
375 mi
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
640 km
398 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
248 km/h
154 mph
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
260 hp
194 kW
7.8 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
434 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,453 mm
57.2 in
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
6.8 s
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
Power
250 hp
186 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
324 Nm
239 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.8 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
Fuel consumption
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
434 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,453 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Range score
603 km
375 mi
640 km
398 mi
CO2 score
278 g/km
-
Trunk score
434 L
15.3 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km21.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi35.20 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year3,281 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6

  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Is 50 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power

Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 V6
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.7 V6
2.7 T V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6
2.5T
3.0T V6
VS
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5TvsNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
2.7 V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
2.5T
3.5 i V6
VS
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5TvsNissanTeana3.5 i V6
2.7 V6
2.7 T V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 T V6
2.5T
3.7 V8 40V
VS
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5TvsAUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
2.7 V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)Facelift 20083.0 TFSI V6
2.5T
535i V8
VS
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5TvsBMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8
2.7 V6
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI
2.5T
2.7 V6
VS
NissanCedric (Y34)2.5TvsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
2.7 V6
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
2.7 V6
2.8 V6 30V
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6vsAUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 vs Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster